On Saturday, 13 June 2015 at 17:33:06 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 6/13/15 9:22 AM, weaselcat wrote:
On Saturday, 13 June 2015 at 15:43:58 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 6/12/15 5:58 AM, Robert burner Schadek wrote:
std.(experimental.)logger has been in phobos for one
release. The idea
was to mature stuff in experimental for one release and then
have a vote
on inclusion into phobos as std.logger.
I would like to see this vote happen before 2.068.
Unfortunately, Dicebot is not longer the review manager.
Who wants to count yes/no/(my logger is better) votes in a
forum thread?
I'd say we hold off on this until we finalize reference
counting.
Right now std.logger requires GC. -- Andrei
"proper" reference counting would be trivial to implement with
a real
macro system.
The true Scotsman, eh :o). Well we don't have a real macro
system. -- Andrei
Yes, and it's an obvious issue. Some of the most frequently
requested things are real tuple syntax, pattern matching, etc.
Short of getting these into D itself(good luck,) any attempt at
these will end up being an ugly hack.
