On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 10:35:30 +0000, Joakim wrote:

> It does require more definitions, but it's worth it.  A simple example
> like yours may seem excusable, but there's no way to limit such logic to
> just simple instances.  Walter is coming from long experience with this,
> and even with my limited experience with such logic, I'm grateful for
> it, as dealing with more complex versions of such logic is a royal PITA.

honestly, if i'll want to have a limited language, i'll take Go. removing 
a power only 'cause it can be abused is not in a "spirit of D", at least 
as i see it. templates can be enormously abused, but noone claims that 
they should be removed, as code without templates sometimes easier to 
follow, and abusing templates can be a PITA.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to