On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 10:26:25 -0400, Joakim <[email protected]> wrote:
Walter explained his thinking behind this decision in five comments on this PR:
Thanks for the link ;) Bit
- version: multiple conditions bitwise via Digitalmars-d
- Re: version: multiple conditions weaselcat via Digitalmars-d
- Re: version: multiple conditio... bitwise via Digitalmars-d
- Re: version: multiple cond... Xiaoxi via Digitalmars-d
- Re: version: multiple ... bitwise via Digitalmars-d
- Re: version: mult... Etienne Cimon via Digitalmars-d
- Re: version: mult... Joakim via Digitalmars-d
- Re: version: ... ketmar via Digitalmars-d
- Re: versi... Joakim via Digitalmars-d
- Re: versi... ketmar via Digitalmars-d
- Re: versi... bitwise via Digitalmars-d
- Re: versi... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: versi... Dennis Ritchie via Digitalmars-d
- Re: versi... via Digitalmars-d
- Re: versi... Dennis Ritchie via Digitalmars-d
- Re: versi... Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
- Re: versi... Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
- Re: versi... rsw0x via Digitalmars-d
- Re: versi... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: versi... rsw0x via Digitalmars-d
- Re: versi... rsw0x via Digitalmars-d
