On Tuesday, 23 June 2015 at 22:45:10 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
A rename can be proposed by creating a subthread: reply to this post, but change the name to the fully-qualified name of the identifier you'd like to see renamed. Please include a rationale and a proposed new name in your post. I'll start.

Rationale:

std.path.setExt is the lazy (range-based) version of std.path.setExtension, thus the only difference in the name is that one is abbreviated, and the other is not. As there is no consistent convention that abbreviated names are lazy, it is not memorable which function is which.

I presented a case in my earlier thread (point 6):

http://forum.dlang.org/post/[email protected]

Proposed new name: withExtension

Reply via email to