On Tuesday, 23 June 2015 at 22:51:08 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Tuesday, 23 June 2015 at 22:45:10 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
Proposed new name: withExtension
I feel this fails the litmus you established before: "These
functions have the same functionality, but one of them is eager,
and the other is lazy. Can you guess which is which?"
I don't think I'd interpret these two names as having the same
functionality in the first place. I'd probably learn their
equivalence completely by accident and only remember it by rote.
-Wyatt
