On 6/25/15 3:57 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Thursday, 25 June 2015 at 19:55:41 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Yeah, I agree for existing names, but these are unreleased new names.

I thought the idea was to use this trick to avoid introducing the new
names, and instead change the established names in a
mostly-backwards-compatible way.

To be clearer, my change would remove the newly-added toExt. I don't consider this a breakage since it wasn't released. Instead, we would rewrite toExtension to do what toExt does, but in a backwards compatible way.

-Steve

Reply via email to