The docs in package.d could show more higher level examples too, before I looked at the code, I didn't realize there was more to it.
Re: std.experimental.testing PR review
Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d Fri, 26 Jun 2015 06:16:08 -0700
Nothing jumps out at me as being especially bad. The posix escape
codes could also be Windows compatible by rewriting them somehow,
instead of building a string, make a struct message { int color;
string text; } or something that you pass to the thread... but
since that's an internal implementation detail that isn't
necessary to work, meh.
- Re: std.experimental.tes... Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.experimental.tes... Atila Neves via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.experimental.testing PR ... Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.experimental.testing... Dicebot via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.experimental.tes... Atila Neves via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.experimenta... Dicebot via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.experim... Atila Neves via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.experim... Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.experimental.tes... Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.experimenta... Dicebot via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.experimental.testing PR review Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.experimental.testing PR revi... Atila Neves via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.experimental.testing PR review Atila Neves via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.experimental.testing PR revi... Atila Neves via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.experimental.testing PR ... Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.experimental.testing... Atila Neves via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.experimental.testing PR review Brad Anderson via Digitalmars-d
