On Saturday, 27 June 2015 at 17:37:13 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Saturday, 27 June 2015 at 16:44:49 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
[...]
And disagreement about how idiomatic such style preferences
should be is exactly the reason why I will vote "no".
Look at it this way : if this proposal will never get to
Phobos, I won't lose anything. It does not have any really
important utility I need in standard library. Main thing about
this proposal is making certain testing style standard - and
thus there is no practical reason to accept any compromises.
I understand your point. _My_ point is that nobody has to use
UFCS if they don't want to. In fact, plain asserts could be used
too.
Atila
