On Monday, 13 July 2015 at 11:26:46 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Monday, 13 July 2015 at 10:12:33 UTC, Faux Amis wrote:
In my experience, vibe.d is a beautiful alternative to node.js
and it is not the immaturity of D that is holding it back,
vibe.d just needs to grow a bit.
But what about the memory model?
Do you think the D GC is sufficient?
Do you think that vibe.d-programming without GC is convenient
enough?
(That is, compared to the alternatives.)
I'm curious.
Today, one wouldn't want to build a business around depending on
Andrei's allocator. But in two years one can presume it will be
relatively dependable (and probably less, given the profile of
the project). And the topic is about the future, not the next
quarter.
So in which cases could one not use the allocator to manage
memory comfortably enough?
And what kind of scale of web requests are you speaking about ?
Laeeth.
