On Mon 13/07/2015 13:26, Ola Fosheim =?UTF-8?B?R3LDuHN0YWQi?= <ola.fosheim.grostad+dl...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, 13 July 2015 at 10:12:33 UTC, Faux Amis wrote:
In my experience, vibe.d is a beautiful alternative to node.js and it
is not the immaturity of D that is holding it back, vibe.d just needs
to grow a bit.

But what about the memory model?
Do you think the D GC is sufficient?
Do you think that vibe.d-programming without GC is convenient enough?

(That is, compared to the alternatives.)

To me the GC is there for prototyping anf the moment we have performance issues we can strip out the lacking parts.

Reply via email to