On 07/28/2015 05:23 AM, "Ola Fosheim =?UTF-8?B?R3LDuHN0YWQi?=
<[email protected]>" wrote:
On Monday, 27 July 2015 at 20:47:08 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 07/27/2015 10:12 AM, "Ola Fosheim =?UTF-8?B?R3LDuHN0YWQi?=
<[email protected]>" wrote:
On Monday, 27 July 2015 at 02:14:57 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On technical merit, AliasSeq is one of the better choices; it was what
TypeTuple had been changed to prior to the recent,
On technical merits "Seq" is one of the worst choices, let's not confuse
social dynamics with objectivity.
Your particular flavour of objectivity.
No. It means I can argue my point and provide references.
There's a bootstrapping problem. It's not even clear what "objectivity"
means here. You have not explicitly listed the criteria you were using
and how you weighted them, neither have you made a convincing point for
them nor provided relevant references. Unless I missed it, that is.
Anyway, it should be pretty clear that all proposed names are bad for
some reasonable choice of "objectivity". If you want to avoid a bad
name, suggest a good one.
