On Tuesday, 28 July 2015 at 08:11:20 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Template constraints? Why on earth would TypeTuple need template constraints? Because it was badly named and has Type in its name? It holds more than types and that's a _good_ thing.
Yes, following the original intention, plain Tuple was the unconstrained version.
It has a perfectly find name given this definition from tuple.html:
"Type Tuples If a tuple's elements are solely types, it is called a TypeTuple"
