On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 04:24:18 +0000 tcak via Digitalmars-d <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sunday, 9 August 2015 at 17:29:08 UTC, karabuta wrote: > > A lot of request are made most often about what needs to be > > added in D and what is lacking (multiple compilers, debugging > > tools, IDEs, GUI, ...). I think a lot has been done already and > > I suggest focus should be centered on making them stable. > > Sadly, some have even been abandoned after all the work that > > went in to them (no names). > > > > Already contribution is not much, so I believe stabilizing what > > we have now will at least give us one thing that is reliable > > rather than many that are not much useful for production. > > > > As Andrei said, people still request more features to be added > > to even C++. That game never stops. > > Why don't we follow a strategy like Intel? Like tick-tock. > > For one version, increase stability, for another, add new > features. Because even intel does not do it anymore ;-)
