Re: dmd codegen improvements

[rsw0x via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 21 August 2015 at 01:20:27 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Friday, 21 August 2015 at 00:00:09 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:

The gdc version, by contrast, inlines *everything*,

This could be why I've observed performance differentials in 
dmd for doing some manual for loops rather than using the stuff 
in std.algorithms.

ldc and gdc typically produce output nearly the same as 
handwritten loops for ranges.