On Sunday, 30 August 2015 at 16:31:17 UTC, Daniel N wrote:
I guess it could be possible to solve using UDA:s instead... maybe I'll try that next, just checking if I'm the only one dreaming about "declarations as template parameters".
What I would love would be being able to pass an anonymous struct to a template. Then you can reflect over it to get declarations and group them too.
(Actually, I'd love to be able to use anonymous structs anywhere a typename is expected. Then you could do:
struct { int a; } foo; // declare a variable named foo as type struct { int a; }
but that might break the parser.)
