On 08/30/2015 08:43 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Sunday, 30 August 2015 at 16:31:17 UTC, Daniel N wrote:
I guess it could be possible to solve using UDA:s instead... maybe
I'll try that next, just checking if I'm the only one dreaming about
"declarations as template parameters".
What I would love would be being able to pass an anonymous struct to a
template. Then you can reflect over it to get declarations and group
them too.
(Actually, I'd love to be able to use anonymous structs anywhere a
typename is expected. Then you could do:
struct { int a; } foo; // declare a variable named foo as type struct {
int a; }
but that might break the parser.)
It does not break the parser. There's only one existing feature that can
start with "struct{" in a place where one might want to use this
feature, and there disambiguation is easy.
