Re: Synchronized classes have no public members

[Dicebot via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 13 October 2015 at 18:28:23 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
Guys, sorry to break into your wishful thinking, but
   synchronized(mutex) {}

already works as you want it to since as long as I can think. 
Yes, it takes a parameter, yes it calls lock/unlock on the 
mutex. :)

Yes, and I am saying that it doesn't justify presence of 
`synchronized` keyword in the language at all, being historical 
legacy misfeature.