Re: Synchronized classes have no public members

[Kapps via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 13 October 2015 at 18:28:23 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:

Guys, sorry to break into your wishful thinking, but

   synchronized(mutex) {}

already works as you want it to since as long as I can think. Yes, it takes a parameter, yes it calls lock/unlock on the mutex. :)

Though really, that could just be:
with(mutex.lock()) { }