Dmitry Olshansky wrote: > No. Conceptually replace does replaceInto but creates a new appender > each time. This is the overhead replaceInto means to avoid.
That's much clear now, thanks! -- Shriramana Sharma, Penguin #395953
Shriramana Sharma via Digitalmars-d Fri, 16 Oct 2015 08:27:02 -0700
Dmitry Olshansky wrote: > No. Conceptually replace does replaceInto but creates a new appender > each time. This is the overhead replaceInto means to avoid.
That's much clear now, thanks! -- Shriramana Sharma, Penguin #395953