On 16-Oct-2015 18:23, Shriramana Sharma wrote:
Dmitry Olshansky wrote:No. Conceptually replace does replaceInto but creates a new appender each time. This is the overhead replaceInto means to avoid.That's much clear now, thanks!
Feel free to improve on the examples, I'd gladly pull such patches. -- Dmitry Olshansky
