Re: s/TypeTuple/AliasSeq/g?

[Dragos Carp via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 20 October 2015 at 13:18:39 UTC, Shriramana Sharma 
wrote:
Since TypeTuple is now an alias of AliasSeq, I suppose it's OK 
to replace all occurrences of TypeTuple in std.traits by 
AliasSeq?

Unfortunately it is not so easy. I think that we can proceed to 
replace `TypeTuple` in `std.traits`, only after we have 
`AliasSeq`-like names for non-private names like `BaseTypeTuple`, 
`RepresentationTypeTuple`, `TransitiveBaseTypeTuple` or even 
`isTypeTuple`. IMO they belong together.