deadalnix wrote: > We should weed these out over time. Not really remove them, as to > not break old code, but just create new names for these and > remove old name from the doc and all.
Working on this right now... BTW "isExpressions" – what kind of singular/plural grammar is that? When renaming `isExpressionsTuple`, I would think it more appropriate to have "isExpressionSeq" since it's an `AliasSeq` containing only expressions and no types. Also, though `AliasSeq` is the same as `TypeTuple`, it would seem `isTypeTuple` is not the same as what an `isAliasSeq` would be, since `isTypeTuple` seems to test for an `AliasSeq` containing only types and no expressions. Possibly this inconsistency is one of the reasons for the name change? Anyhow, given that we are removing all references to "tuple", I would think "isTypeSeq" would be the appropriate parallel renaming of `isTypeTuple` to "isExpressionSeq". But should there then be a separate `isAliasSeq`? I'm not sure how to do that. Code is appreciated... -- Shriramana Sharma, Penguin #395953
