On 10/21/2015 02:24 PM, Robert burner Schadek wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 October 2015 at 17:23:15 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Even simpler, hasMethod!(Container, "append") -- Andrei
I know this goes against your talk at DConf, but having to write string
parameters does not feel good. I'm will properly not be the only one who
will mistype "apend" and wonder why the other template function will be
chosen. I rather have the compiler scream at me telling me there is no
symbol hasApend. And hasAppend!Container is less typing than
hasMethod!(Container, "append").
Yah, but defining isXxx for dozens of Xxx doesn't sit well either. -- Andrei
