Re: Second CT-Parameter of isRange Predicates

[Nordlöw via Digitalmars-d]

On Monday, 2 November 2015 at 14:43:00 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:

On Monday, 2 November 2015 at 14:33:44 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:

https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/3786

Sent an ICBM its way. -- Andrei

Why not extend existing traits with a second `E`-parameter instead of adding a new one?

I think it's very well worth it in terms of expressability.