On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 03:26:47 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Monday, 2 November 2015 at 15:00:23 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 11/02/2015 09:43 AM, Nordlöw wrote:
On Monday, 2 November 2015 at 14:43:00 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
On Monday, 2 November 2015 at 14:33:44 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/3786
Sent an ICBM its way. -- Andrei
Why not extend existing traits with a second `E`-parameter
instead of
adding a new one?
I think it's very well worth it in terms of expressability.
I'd say it's a minor convenience.
I'm actually a bit surprised at the suggestion, since I would
have expected most code to either not care what the ElementType
was or to have to test something about it other than simply
testing for an exact type.
Am I the only one who ever writes `int[]` or `Struct[]` in a
function signature?
Atila
