On 12/02/2015 07:29 PM, Idan Arye wrote: > On Wednesday, 2 December 2015 at 22:57:31 UTC, CraigDillabaugh wrote: >> On Wednesday, 2 December 2015 at 20:45:33 UTC, Idan Arye wrote: >>> On Wednesday, 2 December 2015 at 16:15:04 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote: >>>> [...] >>> >>> The issue is not with humans reading and writing SDLang files - like you >>> said, the syntax is not hard, and besides - the default should be enough >>> for most of the basic learning projects one can make, so by the time you >>> actually need to edit dub.sdl you should know enough D to not be learning >>> two things at once. >>> >>> [...] >> >> Where you looking for this: >> >> https://github.com/ikayzo/SDL.rb > > Yes, and eventually I found it - when I searched with "Ruby Simple > Declarative Language". My point was not that it doesn't exist, but that it > much harder than it should have been to search for it. > > > BTW - I tried, just to see what I get, to search for a Python implementation: > > "Python SDL", as expected, yields only results related to Simple DirectMedia > Layer. > > "Python Simple Declarative Language" the only related thing I find ikayzo's > github page(which contains SDLang implementations for Java, .NET and Ruby - > but not for Python). > > > And here comes the fun part: > > "Python SDLang" does not find the SDLang implementation for Python - at least > not on the first page. > > But - the first 3 results are about an SDL implementation... > > ... it's SDLang-D! > > Yes, you got that right - I searched for something related to Python(!!!) and > got a result for D. So yea, maybe SDLang wasn't created specifically for DUB, > but it might as well have been. Either that, or D suddenly became more > popular than Python. I'll let you judge which of these two alternatives is > more probable.
The fact that sdl shares its name with the Simple DirectMedia Language doesn't really help matters... -- Matt Soucy http://msoucy.me/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
