On Tuesday, 5 January 2016 at 18:02:39 UTC, Suliman wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 January 2016 at 17:10:51 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 January 2016 at 15:20:53 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Walter seems against ARC anyway.
Andrei does not seem to be, however.
D's GC is a failure, the amount of effort needed/given to work
around it should be proof enough of this.
There is no problem, to write on C if you do not need GC.
Then why use D? Most of the standard library and large portion of
language features are locked out if you opt-out of the GC.
If it half-asses two things, then there's no reason to use it.
