On Tuesday, 5 January 2016 at 18:05:37 UTC, Chris Wright wrote:
I might work more on my MUD in D. D's good for MUDs; AI is easier to write (and schedule) with fibers. Some of the networking code is, too.

That's cool! My interest in graphical MUDs was actually the reason for looking into D. I think D's abstraction level would suit a MUD quite well!!

Btw, I've always felt that Unix had a MUD feel to it:
http://mud-dev.zer7.com/1998/9/7952/#post7952

Ever felt that way?

Reply via email to