On 11 January 2016 at 18:56, Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2016-01-11 02:20, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote: > >> Sadly, I don't have any more time I can allocate to this, I'll have to >> chip away at it any further after hours. I really hoped I could get >> this working over Christmas. >> I'll continue to try and reduce the structure of the problem, but I >> still just wish you'd remove the namespace scope. Everything would be >> fixed instantly, I am certain of this. >> This design doesn't give us anything, and you seem to be resisting >> making an argument for its existence. We don't need to do this, we >> don't need to waste any more time. > > > Would it be possible to make the code available somewhere. Remove the > implementations and rename the symbols, or would that be too much work?
Yeah, I'll get to it as I can. It's just a lot of fiddling and I've already spent all my time on this.
