On Tuesday, 12 January 2016 at 05:25:17 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
1. This code { ... } ought to compile with { these semantics }
but does not.
This code...
extern(C++, one) void fun1();
extern(C++, one) void fun2();
... ought to compile.
Considering that all scopes are closed in D, using the current
semantics the short 'non-scope' version of extern is pointless,
as one can at most ever bind to 1 symbol per namespace. For this
reason I suggest to re-purpose it to NOT create a scope. This
would allow the 'scoped' version of extern to remain as is:
extern(C++, one)
{
}
Not perfect, by any means since ideally both 'extern forms'
should have identical semantics, but if the current auto-scoping
feature is here to stay, then they anyway cannot ever be made to
work with the same semantics(since scopes are closed).
Maybe it's something both camps could live with? At least
obsoleting tedious workarounds.
