On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 18:34:24 UTC, burjui wrote:
On Friday, 22 January 2016 at 18:28:31 UTC, Wyatt wrote:
If you need an IDE to work comfortably in a language, something has clearly gone wrong.

Oh come on, not that "Vim/Emacs vs IDEs" crap again. Please stop being so black&white and pretentious.

Begging your pardon?

There's nothing wrong with an IDE; you clearly love yours -- love it to the point of spinning a single sentence into two paragraphs of inflammatory drivel casting me as a cave-dwelling primitive, even -- and that's great for you.

But programming languages exist for people and their affordances come from this understanding, so I'm really not sure HOW you justify a language so poorly designed that it can't comfortably be used without an IDE.

-Wyatt

Reply via email to