On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 23:34:56 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I see no problem with adding a category of rngs that are not forward. Naming is of course the hardest problem in our community :o). A good stard would be a /dev/random wrapper. -- Andrei

It's not about different categories of RNG in this case -- really, NO RNGs should be forward ranges.

If ONLY it was just a naming problem... :-(

Reply via email to