On 26.02.2016 19:34, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 26 Feb 2016 9:45 am, "Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d"
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
> On 2/26/2016 12:20 AM, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>>
>> I thought that mulithreaded I/O did not change anything, or slowed
compilation
>> down in some cases?
>>
>> Or I recall seeing a slight slowdown when I first tested it in gdc
all those
>> years ago. So left it disabled - probably for the best too.
>
>
>
> Running one test won't really give much useful information. I also wrote:
>
> "On a machine with local disk and running nothing else, no speedup.
With a slow filesystem, like an external, network, or cloud (!) drive,
yes. I would also expect it to speed up when the machine is running a
lot of other stuff."
Ah ha. Yes I can sort of remember that comment.
One interesting line of development (though would be difficult to
implement) would be to do all three semantic passes asynchronously using
fibers.
If I understand correctly, sdc already does this with many cases that
need ironing out.
Different passes are not really required once semantic analysis becomes
asynchronous. Just keep track of semantic analysis dependencies, with
strong and weak dependencies and different means to resolve cycles of
weak dependencies. Then write the semantic analysis of each component in
a linear fashion and pause it whenever it depends on information that
has not yet been obtained, until that information is computed.
