On 29 February 2016 at 00:43, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d < [email protected]> wrote:
> On 2/28/2016 1:35 AM, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d wrote: > >> Surely with Fibers everything would be deterministic though? >> > > I don't see the point of fibers if: > > 1. they are running on the same core > That's a reasonable stance to have. I was only considering the speed up of using yield/continue on a declarations' semantic pass verses the double round-robin we currently do for a couple of passes just because of forward-reference issues.
