On Wednesday, 2 March 2016 at 15:57:41 UTC, Piotrek wrote:
On Wednesday, 2 March 2016 at 13:29:03 UTC, Dejan Lekic wrote:
I am not sure I agree with this. "->" will make it *visible*
what is going on, while "." can mean many things, and I would
have to investigate what .something in part of a chain does.
Right?
Are you sure that "->" is obvious in C++? I ask because it can
mean many things, not mentioning it can be overloaded!
Piotrek
Who is talking about C++?? `->` I was talking about is completely
different thing from what `->` in C++. It would/should be
semantically different from `.` in D and `->` in C++.
