On Thursday, March 24, 2016 14:01:04 Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d wrote: > On Thursday, 24 March 2016 at 09:16:51 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: > > Note the lack of tree threading > > That's a feature. Tree threading is one of the worst things I've > ever seen and I wish it would die completely. > > Thankfully, we can turn it off here, but it still kinda ruins > things because it isolates replies, so the same thing tends to be > said over and over again.
LOL. I would _hate_ to lose tree-threading. I wouldn't read the newsgroup any other way. I don't know how anyone keeps tracks of conversations in a sane manner without it. But I'm certainly not against having alternatives in the forum so that users can choose which way works best for them. And folks using a newsgroup reader or an e-mail client to view the newsgroup have the same choice. - Jonathan M Davis
