On 2016-04-29 07:34, ag0aep6g wrote:
I think it's fine with a D range: `foreach (i; iota(0, 5))` is less noisy than the `for` variant.
foreach (i; 0 .. 5) -- /Jacob Carlborg
Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d Thu, 28 Apr 2016 23:28:19 -0700
On 2016-04-29 07:34, ag0aep6g wrote:
I think it's fine with a D range: `foreach (i; iota(0, 5))` is less noisy than the `for` variant.
foreach (i; 0 .. 5) -- /Jacob Carlborg