On 2016-04-29 00:37, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Of course, in an ideal world you'd have a "forever" keyword instead, but
using up an entire keyword just for this one specific kind of loop seems
a little excessive. So for(;;) seems like the perfect balance between
idealism and practicality to me.
In an ideal world the language would support trailing delegate syntax
allowing this to work without any language support:
forever {
}
Translated to:
forever({
});
I'm pretty sure Swift supports trailing delegate syntax.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
