On Tuesday, 10 May 2016 at 17:46:17 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
because we can't know that the Monitor implementation doesn't throw / use the GC.
Why not? Surely this information is available at compile-time?
Re: Is synchronized(...){...} doomed to never be nothrow/@nogc?
Jack Stouffer via Digitalmars-d Tue, 10 May 2016 14:06:58 -0700
- Is synchronized(...){...} doomed to... Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Is synchronized(...){...} ... Jack Stouffer via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Is synchronized(...){.... Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Is synchronized(...){...} ... Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Is synchronized(...){...} ... Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Is synchronized(...){...} ... Mathias Lang via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Is synchronized(...){...} ... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Is synchronized(...){.... Sönke Ludwig via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Is synchronized(...){.... Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Is synchronized(..... ZombineDev via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Is synchronize... Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Is synchronized(..... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
