On Monday, 9 May 2016 at 12:31:37 UTC, Seb wrote:
On Sunday, 8 May 2016 at 20:31:26 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
[...]
Guys - KISS! During the time we already spent in this thread,
we could have written least five great blog entries!
Therefore +1 for static site generators - they keep stuff
simple.
The advantage of Jekyll is that it works so nice with Github
pages and everyone can thus preview the changes on their local
gh-pages branch. Getting the Dlang theme is not difficult, see
e.g. my proposal for to put the DIPs into a github repo:
https://github.com/wilzbach/d-dip
http://wilzbach.github.io/d-dip/DIP86
The DIP Jekyll site builds in ~five seconds (90 pages).
That being said, I like Hugo too.
Btw if we just keep using DDOC (a static site generator), all
the custom macros will continue to work ;-)
So
1) Jekyll
2) Hugo
3) Ddoc
Let's just make a simple decision, create the blog and create
articles.
As long as we don't get any content, this doesn't matter anyways!
