On 6/6/2016 5:19 PM, Brad Roberts via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Safety as a usable subset of D is still pretty non-existent and yet is used as a selling point. The language still has holes -- I don't have bug report numbers, but others have reported them in the past, some closed some not. At the library level things are far worse. I've yet to be able to write any interesting apps with an @safe main.
Without knowing any details of why your app wouldn't compile as @safe, there's nothing useful nor actionable in the complaint.
There also is a conflation of two issues in the complaint - compiling programs that are unsafe despite being marked @safe, and the compiler complaining about unsafe code in code you'd like to be marked @safe. Which is it?
