On 6/6/2016 11:46 PM, deadalnix wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 June 2016 at 06:22:50 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 6/6/2016 10:38 PM, Brad Roberts via Digitalmars-d wrote:
The D ecosystem is a large pile of incomplete features, with more added all the
time.
Even with only array bounds checking, D is safer than C++.
Better doesn't matter. So good that it justify the switch do matter, anything
less is worthless.
The context is someone using C++ for the sole reason that D has holes in @safe,
and that doesn't make sense.
Granted, one can certainly have other reasons to prefer C++. But memory safety
isn't one of them.
