On 6/7/16 10:50 PM, Seb wrote:
On Thursday, 26 May 2016 at 22:05:52 UTC, Seb wrote:
On Sunday, 8 May 2016 at 11:39:45 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
I'm in favour of this, Seb. IMO, the pros outweigh the cons.
Integrated peer-review is a big win.
We already see at our github repos that peer review/help is great, so
why not for the DIPs?
Pinging this one last time as "consensus on strategies, basic project
management for bigger features, better administration of DIPs and module
review queue" is on the draft vision of Andrei and Walter for the next
six months!
Yes, please add it to the draft vision wiki
https://wiki.dlang.org/Vision/2016H2_(Draft). Thanks! -- Andrei
