On Tuesday, 7 June 2016 at 20:50:48 UTC, Seb wrote:
On Thursday, 26 May 2016 at 22:05:52 UTC, Seb wrote:
On Sunday, 8 May 2016 at 11:39:45 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
I'm in favour of this, Seb. IMO, the pros outweigh the cons.
Integrated peer-review is a big win.
We already see at our github repos that peer review/help is
great, so why not for the DIPs?
Pinging this one last time as "consensus on strategies, basic
project management for bigger features, better administration
of DIPs and module review queue" is on the draft vision of
Andrei and Walter for the next six months!
FYI: I'd like to take over DIP management, currently drafting out
process and tools for new system (
https://github.com/Dicebot/DIPs )
