On Friday, 10 June 2016 at 10:38:49 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 6/10/16 9:00 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2016-06-09 23:34, Walter Bright wrote:
That doesn't stop anyone from commenting on them, offering
improvements,
doing some promotion of them, organizing handling them, etc.
If feel that's a bit pointless if no one with some form of
authority
will look at it.
It's much better than making informal remarks on the forum,
which then scroll out of memory. I encourage people who have
good ideas and are willing and able to take them to completion
to formulate them as DIPs. Good quality DIPs will eventually
get discussed more often and end up being implemented. -- Andrei
+1
It's all about working more collaboratively - I believe Dicebot
will do an amazing job as review manager!
If you read his proposed procedure at the WIP-repo
(https://github.com/Dicebot/DIPs), it's about collecting
high-quality DIPs in "Drafts" that are then "brought to the
language authors for review".
