On Friday, 10 June 2016 at 14:38:35 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Friday, 10 June 2016 at 10:38:49 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 6/10/16 9:00 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2016-06-09 23:34, Walter Bright wrote:
That doesn't stop anyone from commenting on them, offering
improvements,
doing some promotion of them, organizing handling them, etc.
If feel that's a bit pointless if no one with some form of
authority
will look at it.
It's much better than making informal remarks on the forum,
which then scroll out of memory. I encourage people who have
good ideas and are willing and able to take them to completion
to formulate them as DIPs. Good quality DIPs will eventually
get discussed more often and end up being implemented. --
Andrei
What is the statistics for DIPs authored by outsiders vs being
implemented?
I don't think that any DIP was proposed by an outsider - the
major problem is that the "Approval" process isn't formal at all,
that's why so many DIPs are "Drafts".
Have a look yourself at the DIP wiki: http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP
