On 16/06/2016 12:57 AM, captaindet wrote:
On 2016-06-16 00:29, rikki cattermole wrote:
Honestly? I read the source for Phobos even with a internet connection
quite often. So having it not included isn't an issue there, but spec is.
real programmers do ...
well, i do sometimes too. but i rather regard myself as an average user,
while i see you as an advanced developer. ppl like me like easy
digestible documentation.
I like my information easily digestible too.
i don't want to start a fight here. if it has to go it has to go. just
making a point that it is useful for some.
maybe a 2nd pdf could be made instead containing the phobos docs?
The spec is quite a problem in reading it isn't as enjoyable as say
Phobos sources. That is why I mention it explicitly. But I have nothing
against pdf form of Phobos docs.
