On Thursday, 16 June 2016 at 02:32:05 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 June 2016 at 10:58:04 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
So I'm wondering if in 2016 someone really needs an offline
copy of a website shipped with a binary release?
For offline browsing, Windows and Linux users can use Zeal [1]
which is FOSS, and macOS users can use Dash[2], which is free
as in beer. Both of which can use this D docset [3].
So no, there's no reason to maintain the chm docs.
[1] https://zealdocs.org/
[2] https://kapeli.com/dash
[3]
https://github.com/Kapeli/Dash-User-Contributions/tree/master/docsets/D#readme
Thanks for the Zeal, I did not know about it.
Both Gnome and KDE have their "help" tools that more/less do the
same.
