On Monday, 25 July 2016 at 03:18:17 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
On 25/07/2016 10:13 AM, bitwise wrote:
[...]
I've been saying for a very long time we need @assumenogc
attribute like we have @trusted for @safe.
I havent seen this assumegc propsal before, could you provide the
definition you had in mind for it?
I have not been taken very seriously about this...
Although I see no reason to allow GC in @assumenogc as long as
it does not trigger scan/collect phase of it. After all, why
don't we have a hint on allocation if we do or do not want it
to trigger a scan?
If the GC supported this mode (NoCollectionMode), what should the
GC do when it is in this mode and an allocation is requested that
can't be done until a collection is done?
