On 7 October 2016 at 18:09, Ethan Watson via Digitalmars-d <[email protected]> wrote: > On Friday, 7 October 2016 at 01:57:06 UTC, Manu wrote: >> >> Regarding 'Linear.No'... yeah... I dunno. I've had this argument before. >> I really hate that pattern. If it's required, I'll do it > > > At least as far as readability goes, explicit parameterisation lets you > understand the invocation at a glance rather than already knowing the actual > name of the parameter or having to go elsewhere in code to see the > prototype. For a library, I'd favor readability.
Oh no, you too? >_< Incidentally, have you had a geez over the core API? An efficient API will emerge when we work out how to work batched operations into ranges...
